As an Italian living in Paris, coming back from Rome on the 9th of July (two days after the 2006 World Cup final) it was impossible to notice how the media actively became part of the world cup celebrations. I found interesting to look at their focus on the 'duel' MATERAZZI vs ZIDANE. Here's the two sides of the fence.
The Italian side
For the italian press Materazzi was one of the key heroes. The number of articles dedicated to his duel with Zidane initially was low, but began to increase as the media noticed that the issue was growing internationally. The main topic was on how he was the unlikely protagonist in all the key events in the final: the goal, the solid marking of Zidane, the Zidane incident, the well taken penalty. The Italian press initially treated Zidane as the hero who unexplicably slipped into madness.
Only after a couple of days, after they noticed the issue escalating internationally, they jumped on it posing (and trying to answer) what became one of the 'taglines' of the post-2006 world cup: what did Materazzi say to Zidane ?.

The French side
The French press were a lot more focused. For them the MATERAZZI vs ZIDANE was only about one issue. The question what did Materazzi say to Zidane ?, was central in their central theme: Zidane was forced into a crime; he is the victim. They helped embed that question into popular culture for weeks after the world cup - it became the equivalent of who shot JR?
They quickly understood and exploited the importance of 'brand' Zidane. In a country that is desperately looking to restore the lost national ‘fierté’ at a time of a deep cultural identity crisis, the media realised and leveraged Zidane as the most positive face of contemporary France.
Their way to leverage the World Cup celebration was to take a clear point of view - Zidane has been unfairly abused and provoked. Their communication was focused on becoming the champions of his defence - literally starting a movement by getting the country behind them. They even succeeded in helping shift the international focus away from Italy's victory, to the MATERAZZI VS ZIDANE duel.
The key characteristics of how MEDIA linked themselves to the World Cup celebrations include:
- they focused their creative work to amplifying an issue; the more focused the better (the french media were much stronger actors than the Italian one, as they had a clear issue)
- they used a star as a symbol for something much bigger than the sporting event (injustice, in this case) turning him into an underdog
- they were very tactical in their approach (although I guess that clearly comes with the role of the daily media) not just reporting on an issue, but actively creating and fuelling an issue.
Aided by circumstances, I give my 'effectiveness' vote to the French press over the Italian one (who was a just a relatively passive participant to the celebrations). The French had focus and a smart way of leveraging a star.