SUBJECTIVE CONTENT TRUMPS OBJECTIVITY
On the 8th October 2008 Liberation's front page read "crisis I write to you...". This was the day when the Financial Crisis looked like it was entering a new uncharted depth and the British Prime Minister announced the UK government was suing the Icelandic one.
In the editorial Laurent Joffrin begins "All crises are also crises of ideas...", he continues "...with the radio station France Info we have decided to take a look at the troubled waters of the world's ideology. In this special issue we have therefore asked 17 artists, writers, intellectuals to give us their first thinking on this financial market crisis...".
On the same day The New York Times, Guardian, Repubblica and other major national daylies were full of interviews and stories from different actors in in the financial world to chronicle the crisis, Liberation had the point of view of 17 artists and intellectuals. The previous day's fall in shares on the world's stock markets were the only facts reported.
I have just gone back to it a month later - after the crisis has discovered many more new depths.
As I look at it again it makes me think of many ads and other communication by brands just stating objective facts about themselves - three thoughts spring to mind :
- Fact based information has become so ubiquitours that alone it's a commodity.
- It's easier to be interesting and stand out with subjective than objective content ideas
- One way to make memorable content is to push an aspect of its cultural context to new levels.
The professor of intellectual history, François Cusset, declares "that small word 'crisis' has lost the freshness of a new concept"; the writer Dominique Manotti states "It's neither moral or amoral, it is how it is"; the philosopher Jean-Claude Milner states "It's the crisis of a capitalism disconnected from natural resources"; the philosopher Yves Michaud says "The problem is that we lack a revolutionary theory"; the humourist Stephane Guillon writes "I'd love it if every frenchmam supported his bank with a smile"; Naomi Klein's article is titled "The ideology of the market-king will not die by itself"; and finally my favourite, the writer Frederic Beigbeder, sarcastically proclaims "we should canonize all traders".
I can's see any national newspaper in the UK or US would have thought of doing it, as in those culture this is sheer stupidity as it goes against the functional reason why newspapers exist - to report stories on what is happening in the world. Objectivity is the backbone of what they see as integrity.
I can't see this happening in a country like Italy. Forgetting for a second the impact of Berlusconi's media dictatiorship - culturally whilst the arts are close to Italians' hearts, populism is a key driver. Originality in Italy is driven by a desire to gain acceptance within the group. Intentional polarisation is not part of Italy's group culture.
In France this seemed almost normal. The replacement of hard 'objective' facts by subjective intellectuals' essays seems more memorable than another day of news. Originality in France is seen as driven by intellectual ideas; the risk of polarisation is as nothing more than a way of asserting a sense of individuality.































